I recently discovered that
the good people at FamilySearch have
added to their online collection of Ohio birth records. Their “Ohio, County Births, 1841-2003” database was just updated on January 16, 2013, with images from several more counties. This database
now contains 3,556,062 records—a fantastic resource for finding births of Ohio
ancestors, particularly those born between 1867 and 1908.
I’ve been playing around with
the database a little bit, and have discovered some quirks, which I thought I’d
share with you. First of all, the name of the collection is a bit of a
misnomer. Even though it says “1841-2003,” the vast majority of the images are
from old county birth registers created prior to the time Ohio started
requiring state registration of births and deaths in 1908.
Here’s where a bit of history
comes in handy. In Ohio, the counties were first directed to start keeping
registers of births in 1867 (Ohio has 88 counties, so that’s a lot of
registers). As you might imagine, compliance with this new-fangled law was neither
immediate nor complete. Some counties, such as Franklin County—home to the
capitol, Columbus—relied on tax assessors to gather birth and death information
from people as they were making their tax collection rounds. I can only imagine
how happy people were to have the tax collector at their door asking about such
things! A big problem with this method is that people who didn’t own property
were often overlooked. Also missed were people who had moved away during the
year. In short, there were a lot of holes in this system.
In other counties, doctors
reported births, sometimes in one big cluster whenever they got around to it.
This could be weeks or even months after the birth took place. The
counties’
burden was lifted in December 1908, when the state took over the job of
registering births and deaths.
So if you click on “Ohio, County Births, 1841-2003,” and then on “Learn More” in the right-hand sidebar,
you’ll find a statement that says, “This collection covers the years 1856 to
1909.” That gives you a better idea of what you’ll actually find in the
database. As a bonus, it also includes more recent delayed birth registrations for
some counties (generally 1940s-1960s).
But back to the database home page. Naturally,
the search box is the place to start looking for the birth record of your Ohio
ancestor. Be flexible and try different spellings—these names were taken from faded
and sometimes damaged handwritten register books. Using the asterisk symbol (*) to stand in
for some of the letters can help. Also, unless the name is a common one, I
usually don’t enter a date or location as a search term to start.
If you find what you’re
looking for, you can see and print the image of the actual birth register. Most of these span two pages, so be sure to click on the arrow to check the next page. Take a moment to think how cool that is,
to be able to find your Ohio ancestor’s birth record from over 100 years ago in
mere minutes!
But if you don’t find what
you need, don’t give up. A recent blog post by the Ohio Genealogical Society
observed that this collection does not seem to be fully indexed. Which means not
everything will show up just by doing a name search. So what’s the next thing to
try? Browsing.
Click on “Browse
through 1,896,221 images” on the database home page. You’ll be taken to a list
of the counties for which records are presently online. Click on the county you want and see what’s available. Some
larger counties have separate index books. If not, you can check the
index at the front of each volume. Find the index page for the first letter
of the surname, and see if your person is there. If he or she is, it’s simply a
matter of getting to the right page in the book.
The collection is not yet
complete, as a few counties (including Geauga) have no records. I hope that in
time they’ll be added, too. FamilySearch
also has another database called “Ohio Births and Christenings, 1821-1962.” It
doesn’t have images of the actual records, but can be a great finding aid. And
at over 2.5 million records, it’s not too shabby, either.
Are you looking for an
ancestor who was born in Ohio? Here's wishing you success with this new resource!
--Shelley
(Baby and scale graphic courtesy of The Graphics Fairy)
Related Posts:
Five Tips for Searching FamilySearch Databases
(Baby and scale graphic courtesy of The Graphics Fairy)
Related Posts:
Five Tips for Searching FamilySearch Databases
Thanks for pointing out this new information, Shelley! I just found my paternal grandmother's birth record!
ReplyDeleteThat's wonderful, Dorene! Don't you love it when you can fill in those missing blanks?
DeleteThis is an awesome resource as the birth registers for Wayne Co are there. Previously even if you had gone to the court house they wouldn't let you look at them - because they said they were too fragile. They had a card index that was all you could use - so this is awesome!! I've found most of my ancestors/relatives here where before I just had to rely on that index. :-)
ReplyDeleteI had success with this database right off the bat, too, so I'm glad to hear about your finds, Diana. No doubt about it, digital images beat a card index any day!
DeleteShelley --
ReplyDeleteThanks for a very useful post! I took a quick browse in Licking County and found another wrinkle: on a register page of births for 1888 and 1889, there were three "outlanders" -- babies born in Knox, Clark, and Pike counties too! I don't have time to follow this up right now but it would be interesting to know how common this is, how they are indexed, and whether they also appear in their native counties . . .
Harold
That's an puzzling situation, Harold, and it would be interesting to find out. I've actually run into that with two of my families--including one from Licking County. The family lived near the county line, and best as I can figure it, the doctor recorded the birth in the courthouse he was closest to, which was not their county. The other one I'm still not sure about, although I have a theory. Maybe fodder for another blog post?
DeleteShelley, I heartily agree with your recommendation to try browsing the records. While it may seem time consuming, there is a system to their organization. I've found some records rather quickly, even though the file was not yet indexed. It's certainly worth a try, if it yields the missing documents for an Ohio ancestor.
ReplyDeleteFor the most part that's been my experience too, Jacqi. it's not as time consuming as it might sound. I like to remind myself that it would take just as long, or longer, to go through a roll of microfilm looking for something. Besides, like you said, the payoff is worth it if you find what you're looking for.
DeleteShelley,
ReplyDeleteYou inspired me to compose a blog post on my finding at Ohio, County Births. It will go live tomorrow. Thanks so much for the inspiration!
I can't wait to read it, Dorene! Thanks for letting me know.
DeleteNot only will this help people researching in Ohio--and I wish my ancestors were from there, since so many of my Twitter friends are there!--it has helped me with several common-sense observations about how to use FamilySearch. I think I'm going to those Rootsonomy training sessions, because too often I get stuck with FamilySearch. I'm happier with Ancestry. But must extend skills!
ReplyDeleteThank you for this post, Shelley.